Part 4 – The “OUR [product name]” element from the positioning statement
The Our Product Element
In this series of blogs we’re looking at the elements of the positioning statement format that Lustratus uses in our REPAMA research methodology.
In this entry I’m going to tackle one of the easier elements, where little specific planning or strategy is needed. Here we’re looking at the “Our [product name]” section of the positioning statement. So as usual let’s look at the context of this element in the wider positioning statement.
FOR [the ideal customer] WHO [has this specific pain or problem] OUR [product name] IS A[product category] THAT PROVIDES [this main benefit and reason to buy] UNLIKE [the primary alternative or competitor] OUR PRODUCT [has this unique selling proposition].
Having said that little planning or strategy is required here, what I should have said is that from the perspective of the product marketing task of creating the positioning statement, the product name is usually already in place. But not always. Obviously an incredible amount of effort, research and focus group feedback can go into selecting the product name. And whilst the name doesn’t usually change based on the ideal customer or the pain that they have, it might be that specific products are “created” so as to appear focused on a specific audience and/or problem.
I’ve had experience of companies (mea culpa!) where the engineering effort required to bring such a product to market stretches only as far as to add an adjective or a noun to a product name in order to make it appear more targeted at a specific problem or prospect.
Whilst the science of product naming is outside the scope of what I want to cover here, if you’re interested there is an good discussion on that subject, as well as many others in the seminal book by Ries and Trout “Positioning: The battle for your mind“. It’s a good read even if its roots are in advertising and it appears a little dated now. Perhaps I’ll revisit it later with a book review.
So other than that, that is the product name section – really just a place holder for, as you might expect, the name of the product (or service).
<More information can be found in the Lustratus REPAMA Guide here>
Danny Goodall.
BTW
It should be borne in mind that Lustratus’ focus is on the high-tech software industry and whilst positioning as a concept will transfer to just about any business to business industry, many of the classifications we use assume that we’re dealing with a technical audience for infrastructure software. So please bear that in mind for your own industry.
Related posts that you might also be interested in...
One Response to Part 4 – The “OUR [product name]” element from the positioning statement
Leave a Reply Cancel reply
Search LustratusREPAMA.com
Top Blog Post Categories
- All Blog Categories (102)
- marketing (88)
- Marketing Strategy (63)
- Competition and Competitive Intelligence (55)
- communication (48)
- positioning (44)
- product marketing (38)
- go-to-market (36)
- cloud computing (25)
- Vendor-Related Posts (23)
- Marketing Tactics (22)
- esb (18)
Latest Tweets
- On Informatica, Evangelism, Audience Strata and BIG-DATA
- The marketing strategies of open source versus closed source ESBs
- Part 2 – First output from REPAMATron – WSO2 versus FuseSource versus Talend versus the ESB market
- First output from REPAMATron – WSO2 versus FuseSource versus Talend versus the ESB market
- WSO2 – Fits in between Talend and FuseSource…
- WSO2, or rather one of its competitors, has thrown its hat into the ring
- Wordcount.org – it counts words…
Pingback: How did Cordys become a cloud computing vendor in 8 days? | Lustratus REPAMA