Truth Denied? The Software Appliance Revisited.

As I mentioned in my last blog entry I’ve had a minor disagreement with Blake Dournaee of Intel over… …whether spin was used in the naming of the product category in which the folks at Intel have placed their SOA security/acceleration technology. You can read about our failure to find common ground as well as […]

Truth Denied?

Plagiarism is the sincerest form of flattery – or something like that. Anyway I’m sure Blake Dournaee of Intel will forgive me for borrowing the title for this blog… …from his own “Truth Denied” blog entry on his Truth in SOA blog. Follow the link and you’ll see that Blake is a little aggrieved at a previous […]

Positioning and the Positioning Statement

Positioning and the Positioning Statement This page contains a summary of a series of blog entries I made during January and February 2009.  It describes the format of the positioning statement that we use in the REPAMA competitive intelligence methodology. I refer to the concept of positioning and the positioning statement frequently so I wanted […]

Part 4 – The “OUR [product name]” element from the positioning statement

The Our Product Element In this series of blogs we’re looking at the elements of the positioning statement format that Lustratus uses in our REPAMA research methodology. In this entry I’m going to tackle one of the easier elements, where little specific planning or strategy is needed.  Here we’re looking at the “Our [product name]” […]

Part 1 – The positioning statement

Positioning Happy 2009! I’ve been in debate with a number of correspondents about the layout and format of the positioning statement that we use in the Lustratus REPAMA-based research.  So I’m going to dedicate the next few blog entries to the positioning statement.  I hope to answer the following questions. What is the positioning statement? […]