Are integration specialists an endangered species?
SOA is great, isn’t it?
Providing standard interfaces, turning code into reusable services, enabling enterprise-wide integration at the drop of a hat … so what does this mean for programmers who specialise in integration? What will happen to those IT professionals who have struggled over the last ten years with low-level integration tools – writing adapters, message-enabling applications, building integrations between different components and platforms and so on. Are they a dying breed?
Not as far as I can see, although it is true that there might be a shift in focus. The fact is that SOA tools only deal with the mechanics of the integration infrastructure. For example, adapters will still be needed to talk to all those vendor packages not offering web services interfaces (ie most of them). But perhaps more importantly, as the level of integration increases, with composite applications being developed to run across the enterprise SOA and beyond, operations will become much more complex. Problem determination and resolution will require the sort of skills common in an integration specialist today, as it becomes more difficult to trace the service on an end-to-end basis. Performance and tuning will become a big issue – service granularity choices and composite application design can have a dramatic effect on operational service levels.
In the end, there is no such thing as magic. Yes, SOA solves some important problems, and enables companies to become more responsive and productive, but it brings with it challenges all of its own.
Steve
Recent Comments
November 1, 2010 (8:36) CICS and PHP - DON'T PANIC It's great to see transactional support of any kind for a cloud language... be it PHP or not (whi...
July 16, 2010 (12:41) Does Micro Focus Server for SOA miss the point? I think Micro Focus has done a tremodeous introduction of Web Service from a COBOL. May not be a ...
June 15, 2010 (6:14) CICS and PHP - DON'T PANIC Hi Steve, Well, we don't actually *demand* that you host the PHP in regions separate to those ru...
April 3, 2010 (12:27) AMQP - Great idea, but it will never work As someone who has worked on DDS from an implementation perspective as well as an OMG standards p...
December 12, 2009 (9:15) Did Teilhard's JuxtaComm patent wipe out IBM, Microsoft and SAP? Subsequent to my post, the Calgary Herald ran an article (http://www.calgaryherald.com/business/P...
December 10, 2009 (9:01) AMQP - Great idea, but it will never work Now, this is a late reply! @Thorlin. I looked at DDS before embarking on AMQP (I also looked a...
December 7, 2009 (2:40) Come in Texas East District Court, your time is up The important thing to remember about patents is that they're all about the claims. While the bu...
October 27, 2009 (9:08) BAM vs BI Good article. Thanks, Emil
October 23, 2009 (11:04) So Oracle got Sun - but why? Oracle has stepped up the rhetoric when it comes to its plans for Sun. In a message to Sun custom...
September 16, 2009 (1:15) IBM gets Cognos to fill the gaps IBM has two BAM solutions now Cognos Now! and Websphere Business Monitor. Why two BAM solutions f...