BEA 360 SOA, but how many dimensions?

I was interested in BEA’s new 360 degree SOA architecture and offerings,…

…announced here. The announcement looks impressive – or at least, the pictures do. But there does not appear to be too much detail at the moment. One thing that worries me is that while it is great to have a 360 degree solution, this may still only cover two dimensions – ie one layer of the problem. BEA points out the new approach brings together Tuxedo, WebLogic and AquaLogic environments…and ‘third-party’.

But the only details available are for the BEA layer of the problem. It insists, for instance, that the new microService architecture is used (mSA) as the SOA backbone, which is built around a publish-subscribe, event-driven model of operations – not much good if you want to use the Request/Reply model. Most of the components seem to require a WebLogic application server environment to run. But what happens when third-party products are present and need to be involved? Does WebLogic need to be installed everywhere? What happens in a mixed WebLogic / WebSphere environment for instance? What about proprietary environments like mainframes?

It appears to me, from the small amount of detail available, that the focus is on the BEA slice of the problem without much consideration for other layers. For that reason, I would claim the solution is limited in its attractiveness, at least until additional details concerning third party environments and alternative SOA implementation models appear.

Steve

Post to Twitter Post to Delicious Post to Facebook Post to LinkedIn

Comments are closed.


Twitter Goodies

Recent Comments

  • Gravatar icon of AJ Brown AJ Brown
    November 1, 2010 (8:36)
    CICS and PHP - DON'T PANIC It's great to see transactional support of any kind for a cloud language... be it PHP or not (whi...
  • Gravatar icon of Vivekanand Kurdikeri Vivekanand Kurdikeri
    July 16, 2010 (12:41)
    Does Micro Focus Server for SOA miss the point? I think Micro Focus has done a tremodeous introduction of Web Service from a COBOL. May not be a ...
  • Gravatar icon of Ian J Mitchell Ian J Mitchell
    June 15, 2010 (6:14)
    CICS and PHP - DON'T PANIC Hi Steve, Well, we don't actually *demand* that you host the PHP in regions separate to those ru...
  • Gravatar icon of Rick Warren Rick Warren
    April 3, 2010 (12:27)
    AMQP - Great idea, but it will never work As someone who has worked on DDS from an implementation perspective as well as an OMG standards p...
  • Gravatar icon of Steve Craggs Steve Craggs
    December 12, 2009 (9:15)
    Did Teilhard's JuxtaComm patent wipe out IBM, Microsoft and SAP? Subsequent to my post, the Calgary Herald ran an article (http://www.calgaryherald.com/business/P...
  • Gravatar icon of John O'Hara John O'Hara
    December 10, 2009 (9:01)
    AMQP - Great idea, but it will never work Now, this is a late reply! @Thorlin. I looked at DDS before embarking on AMQP (I also looked a...
  • Gravatar icon of Jeff Darcy Jeff Darcy
    December 7, 2009 (2:40)
    Come in Texas East District Court, your time is up The important thing to remember about patents is that they're all about the claims. While the bu...
  • Gravatar icon of Emil Emil
    October 27, 2009 (9:08)
    BAM vs BI Good article. Thanks, Emil
  • Gravatar icon of Business Opportunities Business Opportunities
    October 23, 2009 (11:04)
    So Oracle got Sun - but why? Oracle has stepped up the rhetoric when it comes to its plans for Sun. In a message to Sun custom...
  • Gravatar icon of Gaurav Agarwal Gaurav Agarwal
    September 16, 2009 (1:15)
    IBM gets Cognos to fill the gaps IBM has two BAM solutions now Cognos Now! and Websphere Business Monitor. Why two BAM solutions f...