BEA growth in Q3, but…

BEA announced 19% year-on-year growth in revenues for 3Q06 – very nice!

Apparently SOA is a big driver of this growth, with AquaLogic contributing more than 20% of license revenues. I also noticed that license revenue grew 12%, while services grew 24%.

Now, I know that BEA will probably argue that SOA initiatives go deeper in project terms than some of its other product areas, and therefore there is more scope for services. But I can’t help a nagging feeling that if a software company renowned for its standards-based products is growing its services revenues twice as fast as its license fees, this reflects somehow on product complexity, ease of use and intuitiveness. Maybe I am just too suspicious.

Steve

Post to Twitter Post to Delicious Post to Facebook Post to LinkedIn

One Response to BEA growth in Q3, but…

  • It is interesting to compare BEA’s results with IBM’s. IBM grew software licenses faster than services revenue – and clearly IBM would also claim lots of SOA projects.
    My opinion is that BEA has been playing catch up in the SOA space – and must catch up as it will face greater and greater problems as the JEE market matures. Already, BEA’s premium JEE position has come under increasing price pressure from open source on the one hand and increasing realisation that most projects don’t need the full feature set provided (and paid for!).
    At some point, BEA will face the moment of truth faced by any company whose success is built on a single technology wave: how to jump waves without ending up in the water. Unfortunately, the return to core values (focus on the app server) in 2004 after senior level departures signalled the potential beginning of the end – even though that strategy has been dilluted since then.
    Time will tell but I wouldn’t bet my house on BEA.


Twitter Goodies

Recent Comments

  • Gravatar icon of AJ Brown AJ Brown
    November 1, 2010 (8:36)
    CICS and PHP - DON'T PANIC It's great to see transactional support of any kind for a cloud language... be it PHP or not (whi...
  • Gravatar icon of Vivekanand Kurdikeri Vivekanand Kurdikeri
    July 16, 2010 (12:41)
    Does Micro Focus Server for SOA miss the point? I think Micro Focus has done a tremodeous introduction of Web Service from a COBOL. May not be a ...
  • Gravatar icon of Ian J Mitchell Ian J Mitchell
    June 15, 2010 (6:14)
    CICS and PHP - DON'T PANIC Hi Steve, Well, we don't actually *demand* that you host the PHP in regions separate to those ru...
  • Gravatar icon of Rick Warren Rick Warren
    April 3, 2010 (12:27)
    AMQP - Great idea, but it will never work As someone who has worked on DDS from an implementation perspective as well as an OMG standards p...
  • Gravatar icon of Steve Craggs Steve Craggs
    December 12, 2009 (9:15)
    Did Teilhard's JuxtaComm patent wipe out IBM, Microsoft and SAP? Subsequent to my post, the Calgary Herald ran an article (http://www.calgaryherald.com/business/P...
  • Gravatar icon of John O'Hara John O'Hara
    December 10, 2009 (9:01)
    AMQP - Great idea, but it will never work Now, this is a late reply! @Thorlin. I looked at DDS before embarking on AMQP (I also looked a...
  • Gravatar icon of Jeff Darcy Jeff Darcy
    December 7, 2009 (2:40)
    Come in Texas East District Court, your time is up The important thing to remember about patents is that they're all about the claims. While the bu...
  • Gravatar icon of Emil Emil
    October 27, 2009 (9:08)
    BAM vs BI Good article. Thanks, Emil
  • Gravatar icon of Business Opportunities Business Opportunities
    October 23, 2009 (11:04)
    So Oracle got Sun - but why? Oracle has stepped up the rhetoric when it comes to its plans for Sun. In a message to Sun custom...
  • Gravatar icon of Gaurav Agarwal Gaurav Agarwal
    September 16, 2009 (1:15)
    IBM gets Cognos to fill the gaps IBM has two BAM solutions now Cognos Now! and Websphere Business Monitor. Why two BAM solutions f...