IBM: building growth through software, not services
Steve asked the question is the old IBM coming back- promoting its own software products even if they are not the best solution.
I think IBM’s results suggest that the ‘old’ IBM is coming back And I agree with Steve when he says:
“It would be a real shame if [IBM Global Services' independence] was compromised by a limitation to only using IBM’s own tools.”
Unfortunately, the recent evidence suggests that IBM’s engine of growth is no longer services but will now software with all the consequences for the role of IBM Global Services.
Specifically, looking at IBM’s recently announced results and associated comments in Information Week it is clear that their recent acquisition strategy and overall software strategy are paying off – particularly in the SOA space: Software sales were up 8.5% – which was the strongest growth across the three groups. Websphere software sales were up a staggering 30%.
Excellent news for IBM shareholders and potentially good news for other enterprise software companies if it is part of a rising market. However, financial analyst Marc Heilweil suggests that this also reflects a change in emphasis:
IBM is in line with a trend in business, which is to have this complete package, their strategy is to be able to offer a complete suite” of hardware, software and services.
A strategy of offering the complete hardware, software and services solution clearly excludes using the best of breed solutions and hence changes IBM Global Services’ role and its independence. This single platform strategy does give IBM’s customers the benefit of the mythical ‘single throat to choke’. But it also means in some cases providing a sub-optimal solution as it excludes excellent offerings such as those highlighted by Steve and includes some creaky, aging pieces of software such as the Mercator products (acquired as part of Ascential) which have been rebadged (again) under the WebSphere SOA branding but not fundamentally changed for many years. IBM’s customers need to watch out that their throat isn’t the one that is choking
Ronan
Recent Comments
November 1, 2010 (8:36) CICS and PHP - DON'T PANIC It's great to see transactional support of any kind for a cloud language... be it PHP or not (whi...
July 16, 2010 (12:41) Does Micro Focus Server for SOA miss the point? I think Micro Focus has done a tremodeous introduction of Web Service from a COBOL. May not be a ...
June 15, 2010 (6:14) CICS and PHP - DON'T PANIC Hi Steve, Well, we don't actually *demand* that you host the PHP in regions separate to those ru...
April 3, 2010 (12:27) AMQP - Great idea, but it will never work As someone who has worked on DDS from an implementation perspective as well as an OMG standards p...
December 12, 2009 (9:15) Did Teilhard's JuxtaComm patent wipe out IBM, Microsoft and SAP? Subsequent to my post, the Calgary Herald ran an article (http://www.calgaryherald.com/business/P...
December 10, 2009 (9:01) AMQP - Great idea, but it will never work Now, this is a late reply! @Thorlin. I looked at DDS before embarking on AMQP (I also looked a...
December 7, 2009 (2:40) Come in Texas East District Court, your time is up The important thing to remember about patents is that they're all about the claims. While the bu...
October 27, 2009 (9:08) BAM vs BI Good article. Thanks, Emil
October 23, 2009 (11:04) So Oracle got Sun - but why? Oracle has stepped up the rhetoric when it comes to its plans for Sun. In a message to Sun custom...
September 16, 2009 (1:15) IBM gets Cognos to fill the gaps IBM has two BAM solutions now Cognos Now! and Websphere Business Monitor. Why two BAM solutions f...