Legacy transformation – is this the old IBM creeping back?
As part of its latest SOA swathe of announcements, I was struck by the details…
…on the IBM Legacy Transformation Services, targeted at addressing legacy transformation and integration challenges, particularly within an overall SOA strategy. This has led me to wonder about the extent to which ‘old IBM’ is coming back.
This service makes a big feature out of providing a single-vendor solution. This is despite the fact that legacy integration is an area where IBM partners tend to offer far superior products, at least for older levels of mainframe software like CICS and IMS. There was a time when IBM Global Services used to concentrate on doing the best job for the customer, regardless of the supplier. IBM technologies for legacy integration tend to be generalized, and rather messy and complex compared to the smooth, intuitive and specialized solutions from others such as NEON Software (now part of Sonic), Seagull and GT Software. I have seen GT Software’s Ivory in action, for example, and it is remarkably intuitive and streets ahead of the IBM offerings.
I hope this is just a blip. IBM has vast experience, particularly in SOA where it has dealt with many engagements, and it therefore has a tremendous amount to offer in planning, guidance, management and governance services. It would be a real shame if this was compromised by a limitation to only using IBM’s own tools.
Steve
Recent Comments
November 1, 2010 (8:36) CICS and PHP - DON'T PANIC It's great to see transactional support of any kind for a cloud language... be it PHP or not (whi...
July 16, 2010 (12:41) Does Micro Focus Server for SOA miss the point? I think Micro Focus has done a tremodeous introduction of Web Service from a COBOL. May not be a ...
June 15, 2010 (6:14) CICS and PHP - DON'T PANIC Hi Steve, Well, we don't actually *demand* that you host the PHP in regions separate to those ru...
April 3, 2010 (12:27) AMQP - Great idea, but it will never work As someone who has worked on DDS from an implementation perspective as well as an OMG standards p...
December 12, 2009 (9:15) Did Teilhard's JuxtaComm patent wipe out IBM, Microsoft and SAP? Subsequent to my post, the Calgary Herald ran an article (http://www.calgaryherald.com/business/P...
December 10, 2009 (9:01) AMQP - Great idea, but it will never work Now, this is a late reply! @Thorlin. I looked at DDS before embarking on AMQP (I also looked a...
December 7, 2009 (2:40) Come in Texas East District Court, your time is up The important thing to remember about patents is that they're all about the claims. While the bu...
October 27, 2009 (9:08) BAM vs BI Good article. Thanks, Emil
October 23, 2009 (11:04) So Oracle got Sun - but why? Oracle has stepped up the rhetoric when it comes to its plans for Sun. In a message to Sun custom...
September 16, 2009 (1:15) IBM gets Cognos to fill the gaps IBM has two BAM solutions now Cognos Now! and Websphere Business Monitor. Why two BAM solutions f...