More on Fiorano’s component gallery: Can this really work with SOA?
As Steve noted in his last…
…post, ESB vendor Fiorano has just announced a component gallery. I should start by saying that I do find the notion of a marketplace for components attractive and as a concept it has been around for a long time. However, it has never taken off in any previous guise for any but the most technical components.
In the first instance, I think that the blocker is related to the generic SOA reuse issue that has been discussed here and elsewhere: Even within an organization you need to marshal all your technology and organizational resources to achieve reasonable reuse levels. When you try to create a business level component for reuse outside of the organization the problems are much greater again.
The second reason is around the business model: it is hard to make money selling enterprise-style components for $4k off the web. There simply isn’t the volume to support the necessary development and marketing spend. Clearly in the case of Fiorano, this is leveraging an existing business model and therefore may generate some attractive incremental revenue – which brings me to my third point.
Steve already commented on the very technical nature of the components listed. I would go further and wonder why these components are not already in the Fiorano box. Paying $4,000 for something as basic as allowing a single CPU machine (and since just about any machine you will use will be at least 2 CPU this is actually $8,000) to receive HTTP requests seems very high if I am already paying for what is clearly now a basic base product.
And finally, as was previously pointed out on this blog in connection with IONA’s claim to an extensible ESB, this ‘only buy what you want’ approach to introduces a level of complexity around what the product does way beyond the normal comfort level of purchasing managers. Unfortunately to some, it could appear that this approach is primarily about making the base price look attractive and then loading on the extras to solve any real business problem.
Ronan
Recent Comments
November 1, 2010 (8:36) CICS and PHP - DON'T PANIC It's great to see transactional support of any kind for a cloud language... be it PHP or not (whi...
July 16, 2010 (12:41) Does Micro Focus Server for SOA miss the point? I think Micro Focus has done a tremodeous introduction of Web Service from a COBOL. May not be a ...
June 15, 2010 (6:14) CICS and PHP - DON'T PANIC Hi Steve, Well, we don't actually *demand* that you host the PHP in regions separate to those ru...
April 3, 2010 (12:27) AMQP - Great idea, but it will never work As someone who has worked on DDS from an implementation perspective as well as an OMG standards p...
December 12, 2009 (9:15) Did Teilhard's JuxtaComm patent wipe out IBM, Microsoft and SAP? Subsequent to my post, the Calgary Herald ran an article (http://www.calgaryherald.com/business/P...
December 10, 2009 (9:01) AMQP - Great idea, but it will never work Now, this is a late reply! @Thorlin. I looked at DDS before embarking on AMQP (I also looked a...
December 7, 2009 (2:40) Come in Texas East District Court, your time is up The important thing to remember about patents is that they're all about the claims. While the bu...
October 27, 2009 (9:08) BAM vs BI Good article. Thanks, Emil
October 23, 2009 (11:04) So Oracle got Sun - but why? Oracle has stepped up the rhetoric when it comes to its plans for Sun. In a message to Sun custom...
September 16, 2009 (1:15) IBM gets Cognos to fill the gaps IBM has two BAM solutions now Cognos Now! and Websphere Business Monitor. Why two BAM solutions f...