Software AG and webMethods – part II

Previously I have blogged on the SoftwareAG acquisition of webMethods, and what it might mean.

Lustratus also produced a paper on the subject, here. I thought it was time for an update. now things are becoming clearer.

I congratulate SoftwareAG on listening to my comments! Well, at least partially….the company has brought together pieces from both the webMethods and SoftwareAG sides in the area of SOA, and has come up with its suite, offering an ESB (well, actually more than one), adapters, BPM, BAM and legacy and user interface integration support into an SOA suite, called – wait for it – webMethods SOA Suite!

The company has wisely decided to leverage the strength of the webMethods brand name, both in the integration/SOA space and also geographically in the US. My only criticism is that in fact I have been slightly misleading. In fact, I believe the full name is ‘Software AG webMethods SOA Suite’. I just hope leaving the Software AG name so prominently does not backfire.

It seems that the suite will be made up of webMethods BAM and BPM, together with a combination of SoftwareAG and webMethods integration infrastructure products. For example, Software AG’s CentraSite deals with registry/repository needs, and use is also made of Software AG’s connectivity power. So, for example, webMethods EntireX deals with turning legacy code into SOA services. The ESBs are a bit confusing – there appear to be 3. One is a regular ESB, one is an ESB+ (basically the webMethods integration backbone) and one is a lightweight integration tool aimed at partner network needs.

So how is the merger going down? Well, it seems that at least some webmethods customers are glad to see the combination. Apparently this is because webMethods was actually a mature start-up – that is, innovative but not necessarily strong in internal development/delivery/maintenance processes, whereas Software AG has a reputation for being a solid, experienced and mature software brand. So presumably webMethods customers hope Software AG will bring some additional discipline to product delivery and support.

Anyway, the proof of the pudding will be seeing whether the combination gains traction. I think it has a chance, although if only they had dropped the SoftwareAG brand from the suite altogether….

Steve

Post to Twitter Post to Delicious Post to Facebook Post to LinkedIn

2 Responses to Software AG and webMethods – part II

  • Ex-webMethods says:

    The desire of webMethods customers to have the stability on Software AG is not surprising! The webMethods management team was a bunch of folks who had long ago lost interest in aggressively running the company on behalf of the shareholders. There are few better examples than the VPs of marketing and engineering. They were promoted *way* beyond their competence for reasons best left unwritten.
    For webMethods customers, having grown-ups at the helm (as soon as webMethods ex-CEO is gone) has got to be tremendously reassuring.

  • Scott says:

    I agree and can’t wait for to see the combined company strengths. My only regret is that it will likely take 6 months for the products/marketing/sales to catch up to the vision. I think all the parts are there so it will be exciting to see the end result.


Twitter Goodies

Recent Comments

  • Gravatar icon of AJ Brown AJ Brown
    November 1, 2010 (8:36)
    CICS and PHP - DON'T PANIC It's great to see transactional support of any kind for a cloud language... be it PHP or not (whi...
  • Gravatar icon of Vivekanand Kurdikeri Vivekanand Kurdikeri
    July 16, 2010 (12:41)
    Does Micro Focus Server for SOA miss the point? I think Micro Focus has done a tremodeous introduction of Web Service from a COBOL. May not be a ...
  • Gravatar icon of Ian J Mitchell Ian J Mitchell
    June 15, 2010 (6:14)
    CICS and PHP - DON'T PANIC Hi Steve, Well, we don't actually *demand* that you host the PHP in regions separate to those ru...
  • Gravatar icon of Rick Warren Rick Warren
    April 3, 2010 (12:27)
    AMQP - Great idea, but it will never work As someone who has worked on DDS from an implementation perspective as well as an OMG standards p...
  • Gravatar icon of Steve Craggs Steve Craggs
    December 12, 2009 (9:15)
    Did Teilhard's JuxtaComm patent wipe out IBM, Microsoft and SAP? Subsequent to my post, the Calgary Herald ran an article (http://www.calgaryherald.com/business/P...
  • Gravatar icon of John O'Hara John O'Hara
    December 10, 2009 (9:01)
    AMQP - Great idea, but it will never work Now, this is a late reply! @Thorlin. I looked at DDS before embarking on AMQP (I also looked a...
  • Gravatar icon of Jeff Darcy Jeff Darcy
    December 7, 2009 (2:40)
    Come in Texas East District Court, your time is up The important thing to remember about patents is that they're all about the claims. While the bu...
  • Gravatar icon of Emil Emil
    October 27, 2009 (9:08)
    BAM vs BI Good article. Thanks, Emil
  • Gravatar icon of Business Opportunities Business Opportunities
    October 23, 2009 (11:04)
    So Oracle got Sun - but why? Oracle has stepped up the rhetoric when it comes to its plans for Sun. In a message to Sun custom...
  • Gravatar icon of Gaurav Agarwal Gaurav Agarwal
    September 16, 2009 (1:15)
    IBM gets Cognos to fill the gaps IBM has two BAM solutions now Cognos Now! and Websphere Business Monitor. Why two BAM solutions f...