The tip of an iceberg for integration vendors?

On Feb 9th, Oracle and Teilhard Technologies…

…announced a patent-sharing agreement on the use of data-sharing technology, following some legal battles. But the question now is, how many other vendors in the integration space will be affected by the same issue?

According to the Teilhard site, the legal activity surrounded a patent held by Teilhard Technologies, US Patent 6,195,662. The patent is reproduced at the Teilhard site. Looking at this patent more closely, although not explicitly stated in the announcement it could well be that Oracle has ended up having to license this patent to cover its ETL and data warehousing products.

Basically, for those not interested in delving through the legalese of the patent itself, it covers a mechanism for handling the exchange of data between heterogeneous systems. Essentially, data is picked up, mapped into a generic format, manipulated (eg Merge, Append, etc) transported and then mapped into the target format. The generic format trick ensures that source and target are decoupled.

Thinking about this, it seems to me that there must be quite a few ETL and data warehousing type products that do the same thing. Data transformation tools also might be affected – for example Microsoft DTS. Not being a lawyer, I am not sure about the next point, but since XML could be regarded as a ‘generic’ format then does this also mean any product mapping source data into XML and then back again is also treading on this patent?

It will be interesting to see what happens next. This could be the tip of an iceberg, resulting in a ripple of similar agreements over the next 6 months.

Steve

Post to Twitter Post to Delicious Post to Facebook Post to LinkedIn

3 Responses to The tip of an iceberg for integration vendors?

  • Heather Howatt says:

    February 13, 2007
    The tip of an iceberg for integration vendors?
    It will be interesting to see what happens next. This could be the tip of an iceberg, resulting in a ripple of similar agreements over the next 6 months.
    WHAT’S HAPPENED WITH THIS SITUATION?

  • Steve Craggs says:

    Heather,
    I am not aware of any other related activity at this time – but of course things may be happening out of the public gaze. Just like icebergs….
    Steve

  • JuxtaComm dreams of $138 billion in lawsuit against ETL vendors

    Teilhold Technologies subsidiary JuxtaComm has launched a patent infringement claim against IBM, Microsoft, Sybase, Business Objects and a bunch of other IT vendors.


Twitter Goodies

Recent Comments

  • Gravatar icon of AJ Brown AJ Brown
    November 1, 2010 (8:36)
    CICS and PHP - DON'T PANIC It's great to see transactional support of any kind for a cloud language... be it PHP or not (whi...
  • Gravatar icon of Vivekanand Kurdikeri Vivekanand Kurdikeri
    July 16, 2010 (12:41)
    Does Micro Focus Server for SOA miss the point? I think Micro Focus has done a tremodeous introduction of Web Service from a COBOL. May not be a ...
  • Gravatar icon of Ian J Mitchell Ian J Mitchell
    June 15, 2010 (6:14)
    CICS and PHP - DON'T PANIC Hi Steve, Well, we don't actually *demand* that you host the PHP in regions separate to those ru...
  • Gravatar icon of Rick Warren Rick Warren
    April 3, 2010 (12:27)
    AMQP - Great idea, but it will never work As someone who has worked on DDS from an implementation perspective as well as an OMG standards p...
  • Gravatar icon of Steve Craggs Steve Craggs
    December 12, 2009 (9:15)
    Did Teilhard's JuxtaComm patent wipe out IBM, Microsoft and SAP? Subsequent to my post, the Calgary Herald ran an article (http://www.calgaryherald.com/business/P...
  • Gravatar icon of John O'Hara John O'Hara
    December 10, 2009 (9:01)
    AMQP - Great idea, but it will never work Now, this is a late reply! @Thorlin. I looked at DDS before embarking on AMQP (I also looked a...
  • Gravatar icon of Jeff Darcy Jeff Darcy
    December 7, 2009 (2:40)
    Come in Texas East District Court, your time is up The important thing to remember about patents is that they're all about the claims. While the bu...
  • Gravatar icon of Emil Emil
    October 27, 2009 (9:08)
    BAM vs BI Good article. Thanks, Emil
  • Gravatar icon of Business Opportunities Business Opportunities
    October 23, 2009 (11:04)
    So Oracle got Sun - but why? Oracle has stepped up the rhetoric when it comes to its plans for Sun. In a message to Sun custom...
  • Gravatar icon of Gaurav Agarwal Gaurav Agarwal
    September 16, 2009 (1:15)
    IBM gets Cognos to fill the gaps IBM has two BAM solutions now Cognos Now! and Websphere Business Monitor. Why two BAM solutions f...