Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) REPAMA findings published
Just a quick note to say that the REPAMA Segment Analysis Study into the Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) has been published on the Lustratus.com site. The ESB is a segment that Lustratus knows well as we’ve carried out strategic marketing work for most of the key protagonists at some point. That said, there were a number of surprises – chief amongst these was some of the competitive differentiation strategies that we saw as well as the markedly different approach taken by Microsoft.
The study reverse-engineered the go-to-market strategies of the following vendors and products:
- Microsoft ESB Guidance 1.0
- Oracle Service Bus
- Progress Sonic ESB
- TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus
In reaction to client feedback, we’ve published two sets… Continue reading
Posted in All Blog Categories, communication, Competition and Competitive Intelligence, esb, go-to-market, marketing, Marketing Strategy, positioning, product marketing, SOA and Integration, Vendor-Related Posts | 
competition, competitive, Danny Goodall, esb, ESB Guidance, marketing strategy, microsoft, oracle, Oracle Service Bus, Progress, Progress Sonic ESB, REPAMA, Sonic ESB, tibco, TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus | 
Leave a commentPart 8 – The “OUR PRODUCT [has this unique selling proposition] element from the positioning statement
The Unique Selling Proposition
Throughout this series of blogs I’ve been examining the format of the positioning statement that we use in our REPAMA consultancy and analysis services.
In this final entry in the series I’m going to close out by looking at the pay-off, the crescendo, the exclamation mark at the end of the positioning statement – the USP or unique selling proposition.
But first, and for one last time, let’s take a look at this element in the context of the complete positioning statement.
FOR [the ideal customer] WHO [has this specific pain or problem] OUR [product name] IS A[product category] THAT PROVIDES [this main benefit and reason… Continue reading
Posted in All Blog Categories, communication, Competition and Competitive Intelligence, esb, go-to-market, marketing, Marketing Strategy, product marketing, usp, Vendor-Related Posts | benefit, competition, competitive, Danny Goodall, esb, ESB Guidance, Lustratus, marketing strategy, microsoft, oracle, positioning, positioning statement, product marketing, REPAMA, Strategic Marketing, strategy, tibco, usp | Leave a commentPart 6 – The “THAT PROVIDES [main benefit]” element from the positioning statement
The Main Benefit or Reason to buy
In this series of blogs I’m exploring the format of the positioning statement that Lustratus uses in our REPAMA research methodology.
Today I’m looking at one of, if not the most important elements. This is an element that in my experience vendors often find the most difficult to define about their own offering. This is the “THAT PROVIDES [main benefit]” element. First some let’s look at how this element fits into the context of the complete positioning statement.
FOR [the ideal customer] WHO [has this specific pain or problem] OUR [product name] IS A[product category] THAT PROVIDES [this main benefit and reason to… Continue reading
Posted in All Blog Categories, communication, Competition and Competitive Intelligence, esb, go-to-market, marketing, Marketing Strategy, positioning, product marketing, reason to buy, Vendor-Related Posts | audience, benefit, competition, competitive, Competitive Marketing, Danny Goodall, esb, Lustratus, marketing strategy, positioning, positioning statement, product marketing, reason to buy, REPAMA, Strategic Marketing, strategy | Leave a commentPart 5 – The “IS A [product category]” element from the positioning statement
Product Category
Continuing this series of blogs where we are looking at the positioning statement format that Lustratus uses in our REPAMA research methodology. In this blog entry we’re going to look at one of the elements that usually, but not necessarily, picks itself. This entry is looking at the “IS A [product category]” element here.
So as usual let’s look at the context of this element in the wider positioning statement.
FOR [the ideal customer] WHO [has this specific pain or problem] OUR [product name] IS A [product category] THAT PROVIDES [this main benefit and reason to buy] UNLIKE [the primary alternative or competitor] OUR PRODUCT [has this unique selling proposition].… Continue reading
Posted in All Blog Categories, communication, Competition and Competitive Intelligence, esb, go-to-market, marketing, Marketing Strategy, positioning, product category, product marketing | competition, Danny Goodall, esb, Lustratus, marketing strategy, positioning, positioning statement, product category, product marketing, REPAMA | Leave a commentPart 4 – The “OUR [product name]” element from the positioning statement
The Our Product Element
In this series of blogs we’re looking at the elements of the positioning statement format that Lustratus uses in our REPAMA research methodology.
In this entry I’m going to tackle one of the easier elements, where little specific planning or strategy is needed. Here we’re looking at the “Our [product name]” section of the positioning statement. So as usual let’s look at the context of this element in the wider positioning statement.
FOR [the ideal customer] WHO [has this specific pain or problem] OUR [product name] IS A[product category] THAT PROVIDES [this main benefit and reason to buy] UNLIKE [the primary alternative or competitor] OUR PRODUCT [has… Continue reading
Posted in All Blog Categories, communication, esb, go-to-market, marketing, Marketing Strategy, positioning, product marketing, product name, Vendor-Related Posts | Danny Goodall, esb, Lustratus, marketing strategy, positioning, positioning statement, product marketing, product name, REPAMA, Strategic Marketing, strategy | 1 CommentPart 3 – The “WHO [has this specific pain or problem]” element from the positioning statement
Pain, problem, need or desire
Continuing the series of blogs looking at the elements of the positioning statement I’m going to look at the customer pain or problem section.
In this entry I will look at the pain, problem, need or desire that we believe that target customer is looking to resolve. So just so we have a the context for the discussion, here is the positioning statement format that Lustratus uses.
FOR [the ideal customer] WHO [has this specific pain or problem] OUR [product name] IS A[product category] THAT PROVIDES [this main benefit and reason to buy] UNLIKE [the primary alternative or competitor] OUR PRODUCT [has this unique selling proposition].… Continue reading
Posted in All Blog Categories, communication, Competition and Competitive Intelligence, esb, marketing, Marketing Strategy, pain, positioning, product marketing, product name, SOA and Integration | competition, competitive, customer pain, Danny Goodall, esb, Lustratus, marketing strategy, positioning, positioning statement, product marketing, REPAMA, Strategic Marketing, strategy | Leave a commentPart 2 – The “FOR [ideal customer]” element from the positioning statement
The Ideal Customer
As mentioned in the previous blog entry on the positioning statement, I’m going to continue to flesh out the details of the seven other positioning elements.
This time its the ideal target customer, so let’s first revisit the format of the positioning statement just to give us a context.
FOR [the ideal customer] WHO [has this specific pain or problem] OUR [product name] IS A[product category] THAT PROVIDES [this main benefit and reason to buy] UNLIKE [the primary alternative or competitor] OUR PRODUCT [has this unique selling proposition].
The ideal customer allows the organisation creating the positioning statement to express the characteristics of their ideal target customer for the… Continue reading
Posted in All Blog Categories, communication, Competition and Competitive Intelligence, esb, ideal customer, job roles, marketing, Marketing Strategy, positioning, product marketing, prospects | competition, competitive, Danny Goodall, esb, ideal customer, Lustratus, marketing strategy, positioning, positioning statement, product marketing, REPAMA, Strategic Marketing, strategy | Leave a comment
- Corporate DNA @ Progress Software – Redux
- Heroku Versus AppEngine and Amazon EC2 – Where Does it fit in?
- …We didn’t have an ice cream…
- On Informatica, Evangelism, Audience Strata and BIG-DATA
- The marketing strategies of open source versus closed source ESBs
- Part 2 – First output from REPAMATron – WSO2 versus FuseSource versus Talend versus the ESB market
- First output from REPAMATron – WSO2 versus FuseSource versus Talend versus the ESB market
Recent Comments
May 12, 2011 (12:01) The Goodall Technology Reading Ease Index - How Complex is Your Marketing Copy? Hmm. I really do like the name Sarah but what about my ego? If I were to call the index 'GoodRead...
May 12, 2011 (11:36) The Goodall Technology Reading Ease Index - How Complex is Your Marketing Copy? I suggest calling it the GoodRead Index. Maybe it's over-reaching a bit, but you'll just have to ...
October 14, 2010 (4:19) Truth Denied? The Software Appliance Revisited. I hope you could tell that I was being more than a little flippant here Jacques. Perhaps I should...
October 13, 2010 (1:56) Truth Denied? The Software Appliance Revisited. Allow me to disagrre. At a customer, we have used Datapower for years to process XML (BTW, it is ...
June 7, 2010 (4:38) New Report From Lustratus Research: A Competitive Review of SOA Appliances Pete,Thanks for your comments, and those of your colleague. I think Danny has answered the 'mar...
June 4, 2010 (4:03) New Report From Lustratus Research: A Competitive Review of SOA Appliances Hi,I'd very much like to develop a point made in the report where it is asserted that software ...
May 6, 2010 (12:35) New Report From Lustratus Research: A Competitive Review of SOA Appliances Thanks for your comment Blake. This is a marketing-focused blog that looks at different vendors' ...
May 5, 2010 (1:23) New Report From Lustratus Research: A Competitive Review of SOA Appliances Hello There - It seems that this is a very provocative report, especially with respect to the sta...
April 14, 2010 (2:57) The Decision Making Unit for Cloud Computing Nice Technology Related Blog. Will visit again.
October 16, 2009 (5:56) The Decision Making Unit for Cloud Computing Very interesting point of discussion. I would be very interested to hear your results.