Strategic Marketing

Page 2 of 3123

Updated High Performance Messaging Report

TIBCO LogoJust a quick note to say that the updated High Performance Messaging REPAMA Segment Analysis Study has been uploaded to the Lustratus site.  It now contains the reverse-engineered product marketing strategy for TIBCO’s Messaging Appliance P-7500.  Existing customers and Lustratus research subscription holders will already have been contacted with details of free upgrades.

Following on from the blog entry I made when the first version of the report was released I thought I’d show the updated value proposition below.  As I mentioned in a previous blog entry TIBCO’s primary competitive focus is very unusual – it is TIBCO Rendezvous – one of its own products.  The different approach to the market doesn’t stop there as you’ll… Continue reading

Standards-based marketing – an antidote “Partner” Part 5

HandShakeI’m carrying on this series of posts on how vendors can differentiate themselves in the market when technical standards have had the effect of removing significant functional difference between competitive products.

This time I’m going to look at partnering to create differentiation in your offer.  Whilst the product proposition will remain materially similar to that of the standards-driven competition, a proposition carved from the synergies of the product and a strategic partner can be beneficial.

Partnering – Other complimentary vendors

As I suggested in this post, broadening the product portfolio is one way to create differentiation.  Whilst this can be done through internal product development, it is also possible to broaden the product proposition through strategic partnerships.… Continue reading

Standards-based marketing – an antidote “Broaden the Debate” Part 4

Debate 1Part 4 – Broaden the Debate

I’m continuing this series of blogs here by looking at the techniques that software vendors can use to create the “illusion” of differentiation in markets where technical standards have led to little material product difference.

So moving on from my last blog where I looked at the way an organisation can differentiate based on the way that they sell, this entry will look at techniques to move the focus away from the technology and onto some other element of the proposition where real differentiation between vendors exists.

I should perhaps first acknowledge that achieving this sort of holistic approach to taking a proposition to market is not the work of moments.  It takes… Continue reading

Standards-based marketing – the homogeneous effect of software standards – Part 2

sonic software logo

A History Lesson

Continuing on from this blog entry, I’ve decided to create another mini series of blogs, this time looking at the difficulty of differentiation in markets where software standards have created homogeneity amongst the offerings of the protagonists.

So first a little bit of a history lesson…

I surfed the wave of middleware resurgence in the early stages of the new millennium and had great success marketing various technologies. Initially, working with some of the best people in the industry, I introduced SonicMQ to the world while at Sonic Software (now Progress Software).  This was a market proposition that was heavily based on standards. Well at least we… Continue reading

Open Source and the Impotence(sic) of Being Earnest

Oscar WildeQ. What do the questions…

“How do porcupines make love?”

and

“How do you ‘sell’ open source software?”

…have in common?

A. The answer to both is “Carefully!”

Software sales is a funny business.  Push too hard and you’re open to accusations of potentially ripping people off through aggressive tactics, don’t push hard enough and you end up having had many nice discussions (tea and biscuit meetings as they are known) with many nice people but your children go hungry.  It’s a balance.  And nowhere is this more in evidence than in the open source world.

I was chatting to an ex-colleague last week about the issues they have taking their open source software products to market.… Continue reading

Audience Strata

audience strata 2

In infrastructure software sales and marketing, Lustratus categorises the primary end user target audience as one or more of the following three categories:

  • IT Technical – Represents the overtly technical disciplines within the IT organisation that have no management, strategic  or commercial responsibilities
  • IT Business – Represents the higher management levels of the IT organisation that have strategic and/or financial responsibilities
  • Business – Represents the line of business functions outside of the IT organisation

Whilst there are many subtle distinctions between these these layers a general description of the types of positions and the role of they play in enterprise software sales for infrastructure software is shown in the diagram below:

audience strata 3

Danny Goodall

Related posts that you might also… Continue reading

Positioning and the Positioning Statement

Positioning and the Positioning Statement

This page contains a summary of a series of blog entries I made during January and February 2009.  It describes the format of the positioning statement that we use in the REPAMA competitive intelligence methodology. I refer to the concept of positioning and the positioning statement frequently so I wanted to pull them all together in once place.  So here you are.

Danny Goodall

Links to Original Posts

The Positioning Statement
FOR… positioning element
WHO…positioning element
OUR…positioning element
IS A…positioning element
THAT PROVIDES…positioning element
UNLIKE…positioning element
OUR PRODUCT…positioning element

Positioning Cross HairsPart 1 – Positioning

Happy 2009! I’ve been in debate with a number of correspondents about the layout and format of the positioning statement… Continue reading

Part 8 – The “OUR PRODUCT [has this unique selling proposition] element from the positioning statement

USP red apple amongst greenThe Unique Selling Proposition

Throughout this series of blogs I’ve been examining the format of the positioning statement that we use in our REPAMA consultancy and analysis services.

In this final entry in the series I’m going to close out by looking at the pay-off, the crescendo, the exclamation mark at the end of the positioning statement – the USP or unique selling proposition.

But first, and for one last time, let’s take a look at this element in the context of the complete positioning statement.

FOR [the ideal customer] WHO [has this specific pain or problem] OUR [product name] IS A[product category] THAT PROVIDES [this main benefit and reason… Continue reading

Part 7 – The “UNLIKE [the primary alternative]” element from the positioning statement

Spot the differenceThe Primary Competitor or Alternative

I’ve been looking at the positioning statement In this series of blogs.  This entry will focus on the UNLIKE [the primary alternative or competitor] element.

So just to recap here we’re constructing a natural language statement that captures a number of key strategic marketing positioning elements.  This particular element in the positioning statement above is where the ideal customer’s alternative to our product is defined.

First let’s see this element in the context of the complete positioning statement.

FOR [the ideal customer] WHO [has this specific pain or problem] OUR [product name] IS A[product category] THAT PROVIDES [this main benefit and reason to buy] UNLIKE [the… Continue reading

Part 6 – The “THAT PROVIDES [main benefit]” element from the positioning statement

Present boxThe Main Benefit or Reason to buy

In this series of blogs I’m exploring the format of the positioning statement that Lustratus uses in our REPAMA research methodology.

Today I’m looking at one of, if not the most important elements.  This is an element that in my experience vendors often find the most difficult to define about their own offering.  This is the “THAT PROVIDES [main benefit]” element.  First some let’s look at how this element fits into the context of the complete positioning statement.

FOR [the ideal customer] WHO [has this specific pain or problem] OUR [product name] IS A[product category] THAT PROVIDES [this main benefit and reason to… Continue reading

Page 2 of 3123

Latest Tweets

Recent Comments

CACHED !!!
  • Gravatar icon of Danny Goodall Danny Goodall
    May 12, 2011 (12:01)
    The Goodall Technology Reading Ease Index - How Complex is Your Marketing Copy? Hmm. I really do like the name Sarah but what about my ego? If I were to call the index 'GoodRead...
  • Gravatar icon of Sarah Bourne Sarah Bourne
    May 12, 2011 (11:36)
    The Goodall Technology Reading Ease Index - How Complex is Your Marketing Copy? I suggest calling it the GoodRead Index. Maybe it's over-reaching a bit, but you'll just have to ...
  • Gravatar icon of Danny Goodall Danny Goodall
    October 14, 2010 (4:19)
    Truth Denied? The Software Appliance Revisited. I hope you could tell that I was being more than a little flippant here Jacques. Perhaps I should...
  • Gravatar icon of Jacques Talbot Jacques Talbot
    October 13, 2010 (1:56)
    Truth Denied? The Software Appliance Revisited. Allow me to disagrre. At a customer, we have used Datapower for years to process XML (BTW, it is ...
  • Gravatar icon of Steve Craggs Steve Craggs
    June 7, 2010 (4:38)
    New Report From Lustratus Research: A Competitive Review of SOA Appliances Pete,Thanks for your comments, and those of your colleague. I think Danny has answered the 'mar...
  • Gravatar icon of Pete Logan Pete Logan
    June 4, 2010 (4:03)
    New Report From Lustratus Research: A Competitive Review of SOA Appliances Hi,I'd very much like to develop a point made in the report where it is asserted that software ...
  • Gravatar icon of Danny Goodall Danny Goodall
    May 6, 2010 (12:35)
    New Report From Lustratus Research: A Competitive Review of SOA Appliances Thanks for your comment Blake. This is a marketing-focused blog that looks at different vendors' ...
  • Gravatar icon of Blake Dournaee Blake Dournaee
    May 5, 2010 (1:23)
    New Report From Lustratus Research: A Competitive Review of SOA Appliances Hello There - It seems that this is a very provocative report, especially with respect to the sta...
  • Gravatar icon of SaaS SaaS
    April 14, 2010 (2:57)
    The Decision Making Unit for Cloud Computing Nice Technology Related Blog. Will visit again.
  • Gravatar icon of Zaki Usman Zaki Usman
    October 16, 2009 (5:56)
    The Decision Making Unit for Cloud Computing Very interesting point of discussion. I would be very interested to hear your results.